Scoped Refactor Commit

How to write a refactor commit with a scope. Learn when to use the refactor type and how scopes organize changes in larger codebases.

Scoped Commits

Detailed Explanation

The refactor Type with Scope

A refactor commit restructures existing code without changing its external behavior. When combined with a scope, it clearly communicates which module or area of the codebase was refactored.

Example

refactor(database): replace raw SQL queries with query builder

Migrate all repository methods from string-concatenated SQL
to the Knex query builder. This improves type safety,
prevents SQL injection, and makes queries database-agnostic.

When to Use refactor

Use refactor when you:

  • Restructure code without changing behavior
  • Extract functions, classes, or modules
  • Rename variables, functions, or files
  • Simplify complex logic
  • Apply design patterns

Do not use refactor when:

  • Fixing a bug (use fix)
  • Adding new functionality (use feat)
  • Improving performance (use perf)
  • Changing formatting only (use style)

Scope Guidelines for Refactoring

Since refactoring often touches multiple files, choose the scope that represents the primary area of change:

refactor(auth): extract token validation middleware
refactor(models): normalize database entity relationships
refactor(utils): split string helpers into separate modules
refactor(tests): convert callback-based tests to async/await

Version Impact

Refactoring commits typically do not trigger a version bump in semantic-release configurations. They are internal changes that should not affect consumers. However, they appear in changelogs under a "Refactoring" or "Code Changes" section, which is useful for contributors.

Common Pitfalls

  • Mixing refactoring with features: If you refactor code and add a feature in the same commit, use feat. The feature is the more significant change.
  • Overly broad scopes: refactor(app): restructure everything is too vague. Break it into smaller, focused commits.

Use Case

Use scoped refactor commits to track structural improvements in specific modules. This is particularly valuable in code reviews, where reviewers can quickly identify that a commit only restructures code and does not change behavior, allowing them to focus on the structural quality rather than functional correctness.

Try It — Conventional Commits Linter

Open full tool