Scoped Refactor Commit
How to write a refactor commit with a scope. Learn when to use the refactor type and how scopes organize changes in larger codebases.
Detailed Explanation
The refactor Type with Scope
A refactor commit restructures existing code without changing its external behavior. When combined with a scope, it clearly communicates which module or area of the codebase was refactored.
Example
refactor(database): replace raw SQL queries with query builder
Migrate all repository methods from string-concatenated SQL
to the Knex query builder. This improves type safety,
prevents SQL injection, and makes queries database-agnostic.
When to Use refactor
Use refactor when you:
- Restructure code without changing behavior
- Extract functions, classes, or modules
- Rename variables, functions, or files
- Simplify complex logic
- Apply design patterns
Do not use refactor when:
- Fixing a bug (use
fix) - Adding new functionality (use
feat) - Improving performance (use
perf) - Changing formatting only (use
style)
Scope Guidelines for Refactoring
Since refactoring often touches multiple files, choose the scope that represents the primary area of change:
refactor(auth): extract token validation middleware
refactor(models): normalize database entity relationships
refactor(utils): split string helpers into separate modules
refactor(tests): convert callback-based tests to async/await
Version Impact
Refactoring commits typically do not trigger a version bump in semantic-release configurations. They are internal changes that should not affect consumers. However, they appear in changelogs under a "Refactoring" or "Code Changes" section, which is useful for contributors.
Common Pitfalls
- Mixing refactoring with features: If you refactor code and add a feature in the same commit, use
feat. The feature is the more significant change. - Overly broad scopes:
refactor(app): restructure everythingis too vague. Break it into smaller, focused commits.
Use Case
Use scoped refactor commits to track structural improvements in specific modules. This is particularly valuable in code reviews, where reviewers can quickly identify that a commit only restructures code and does not change behavior, allowing them to focus on the structural quality rather than functional correctness.